I watched Arya 2 a while back. I really liked the movie. I have been thinking to write about it. Though, I did not like Arya (prequel) because of the performance of the actors, I was impressed by the concept of the story and that too in Telugu. I say that because in the contemporary situation that kind of a movie will not get you money in telugu industry but the movie proved me wrong. The director has projected the concept in such a way so that it would please the majority of the telugu audiences too, which is what I liked.
When I watched the second movie of Sukumar (the director I am talking about) i.e. Jagadam, I maintained the same respect for him because the concept is tough to make money in telugu industry. As expected it was a dud but he made a very good effort.
Then comes Arya 2, which blew my mind away. This time the story is way more away from gaining acceptance from majority of the telugu audience but he maintained his path and did it. I think the movie did well in financial terms too. It was stylish, very well executed and blend to make it viewable by telugu audience. I wouldn't dare to even think of filming such a concept if I were filming for telugu audience. The story starts of by showing the lead actor in a negative shade and he defines it well for doing so. I wasn't bored at any point. The movie is very finely weaved with the comic, surprise and the elements that would make it acceptable by telugu audience. I would say it's one of the greatest and brave screen-plays in telugu film industry. Sukumar's honesty, courage are greatly commendable prior to his movie making skills. Kudos Sukumar, you have done a great job.
I appreciate the actors for accepting such a movie too, mainly Arjun because he being a son of the film producer and the current trend is that none of the proteges are even thinking of doing something fresh and new. He did a character with negative shades and that which will be disliked by majority of the telugu public. There you go Arjun - great job and great choice.
Overall a great truthful and honest movie and a different one.
From the others I have seen in recent times, I liked 3 idiots, blind side, People vs Larry Flynt.
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Dec 18, 2007
I dont remember the exact dates, when I watched the following movies. Randomly over all the previous days. Most of the days have been spent reading discourses of OSHO so movies took a side track.
Before Sunset: I liked this movie a lot. The whole movie is set up in France where the actor and actress walk on the roads just talking about their previous meeting, future plans, present work. It has a philosophical touch to the conversation. Its a very short and sweet movie. I could connect to the movie very well. A nice and different concept too.
Before Sunrise: It is a prequel to "Before Sunset". I happened to watch this after "Before Sunset". I liked it. It also deals with same two people roaming in Vienna talking about their previous, present and future experiences. It also deals much with philosophical thoughts. Its nice.
Jab we met (Hindi/Indian): The first half of this movie is very funny. Its nice comedy. The second half moves to be a bit slow. Overall its good, can watch it once. The performances of the actors are good.
Fracture: The movie was interesting and thrilling for the first half or a bit more but the climax was not good. It was not so appealing. The initial set up and the carrying of the movie was good.
Gangster (Hindi/Indian): The taking of the movie was good. It had suspense element. I thought it was not a very new concept, usual mafia, gangs related. I felt its OK movie.
Before Sunset: I liked this movie a lot. The whole movie is set up in France where the actor and actress walk on the roads just talking about their previous meeting, future plans, present work. It has a philosophical touch to the conversation. Its a very short and sweet movie. I could connect to the movie very well. A nice and different concept too.
Before Sunrise: It is a prequel to "Before Sunset". I happened to watch this after "Before Sunset". I liked it. It also deals with same two people roaming in Vienna talking about their previous, present and future experiences. It also deals much with philosophical thoughts. Its nice.
Jab we met (Hindi/Indian): The first half of this movie is very funny. Its nice comedy. The second half moves to be a bit slow. Overall its good, can watch it once. The performances of the actors are good.
Fracture: The movie was interesting and thrilling for the first half or a bit more but the climax was not good. It was not so appealing. The initial set up and the carrying of the movie was good.
Gangster (Hindi/Indian): The taking of the movie was good. It had suspense element. I thought it was not a very new concept, usual mafia, gangs related. I felt its OK movie.
Tuesday, November 6, 2007
6 Nov, 2007
I slowed down the number of movies I usually watch over the weekends. May be wanted a break. Here are the list of movies, I watched over the past weekend and the one before that.
Wedding crashers (English): It was a good movie. The story was about two guys, who crash weddings so that they can get laid with the women. It was funny. The climax was very good. The guy mentions that he crashed a death too and it all jelled well. I liked it.
Dollar dreams (Telugu/Indian): An excellent movie. I didnt watch it all these days thinking it might be like a documentary but its not. The movie has the needed proportions of comedy, drama, etc everything. I liked it a lot. I could relate to every scene of the movie. I watched it twice. There was a bit of unrealistic element in the form of one character but that was ok with me. Overall its a very good movie. I watched the scenes, I liked, more than twice.
this past weekend, I can say, I dedicated it to Nagesh Kukunoor - Indian film writer, producer and director. I havent watched any of his films till last week because I was assuming they are all art films and I cant bear them but to my utter surprise, I was wrong. The movies were all good, I should say the later were brilliant and I could connect with all of them. I started to admire this guy and his work.
Iqbal (Hindi/Indian): Awesome movie. Its about a deaf and dumb guy aspiring to be a national level cricket player. I didnt feel bored or disconnected atleast a single moment, which I earlier thought I would. The catalyst is the boy having an interest in learning the game. The big event takes place when he is accepted by a cricket coaching academy. The mid point is when the boy is thrown out of academy. The crisis is when the boy doesnt get selected for national level but gets a chance to play for Ranji trophy. The climax is when the boy has to decide if he has to do his best at Ranji or accept the check given by the antagonist and quit the game. The resolution is the boy plays well, gets money from the sponsoring company and thats it. It ends well. The boy realizes his dream. A wonderful movie with a good background score. All the actors did a wonderful job.
Dor (Hindi/Indian): Brilliant movie. Same pre-notion of mine went with this one too but I proved to be wrong again. Its a very authentic, novel story executed in a superb way. Its very simple story. Its all about one woman, going in search of other to save her husband. Nothing artificial, complex, hi-fi, blowing some buildings or mafia or ...etc. Its just subtle human emotions. The characterization of both the women have been done perfectly. Both of them have equal screen space. The comic aspect is provided in the form of the guy who comes to help the protagonist. I was moved. Its a brave attempt at a different concept and it was done greatly.
Hyderabad Blues (Telugu/Indian): Its a time pass flick. Its more of a comedy type film. Its about a guy who comes from USA after 12 years and who cannot accept all the previous aspects of the culture. He finds his own way of taking the good from both the cultures. Its funny.
thats it for now...
-Shiva
Wedding crashers (English): It was a good movie. The story was about two guys, who crash weddings so that they can get laid with the women. It was funny. The climax was very good. The guy mentions that he crashed a death too and it all jelled well. I liked it.
Dollar dreams (Telugu/Indian): An excellent movie. I didnt watch it all these days thinking it might be like a documentary but its not. The movie has the needed proportions of comedy, drama, etc everything. I liked it a lot. I could relate to every scene of the movie. I watched it twice. There was a bit of unrealistic element in the form of one character but that was ok with me. Overall its a very good movie. I watched the scenes, I liked, more than twice.
this past weekend, I can say, I dedicated it to Nagesh Kukunoor - Indian film writer, producer and director. I havent watched any of his films till last week because I was assuming they are all art films and I cant bear them but to my utter surprise, I was wrong. The movies were all good, I should say the later were brilliant and I could connect with all of them. I started to admire this guy and his work.
Iqbal (Hindi/Indian): Awesome movie. Its about a deaf and dumb guy aspiring to be a national level cricket player. I didnt feel bored or disconnected atleast a single moment, which I earlier thought I would. The catalyst is the boy having an interest in learning the game. The big event takes place when he is accepted by a cricket coaching academy. The mid point is when the boy is thrown out of academy. The crisis is when the boy doesnt get selected for national level but gets a chance to play for Ranji trophy. The climax is when the boy has to decide if he has to do his best at Ranji or accept the check given by the antagonist and quit the game. The resolution is the boy plays well, gets money from the sponsoring company and thats it. It ends well. The boy realizes his dream. A wonderful movie with a good background score. All the actors did a wonderful job.
Dor (Hindi/Indian): Brilliant movie. Same pre-notion of mine went with this one too but I proved to be wrong again. Its a very authentic, novel story executed in a superb way. Its very simple story. Its all about one woman, going in search of other to save her husband. Nothing artificial, complex, hi-fi, blowing some buildings or mafia or ...etc. Its just subtle human emotions. The characterization of both the women have been done perfectly. Both of them have equal screen space. The comic aspect is provided in the form of the guy who comes to help the protagonist. I was moved. Its a brave attempt at a different concept and it was done greatly.
Hyderabad Blues (Telugu/Indian): Its a time pass flick. Its more of a comedy type film. Its about a guy who comes from USA after 12 years and who cannot accept all the previous aspects of the culture. He finds his own way of taking the good from both the cultures. Its funny.
thats it for now...
-Shiva
Monday, October 15, 2007
Oct 15, 2007
I didnt update the blog last week (was lazy) but I watched many movies last weekend (oct 6,7). I dont even remember all the titles. Here is the list of the ones for this weekend.
Memento(English): Watching it for 2nd time. A good movie. Brilliant screenplay. Nice sub-plot. It depicts a novel way of capturing an ordinary story.
3:10 to Yuma (English): OK. The climax scene was moving. Other than that the remaining part was ok. I felt it was not a great movie because the weakness in story. The story is all about moving a thief from one village to the nearby train station. The protagonist agrees to do it for some amount.
Death Proof (English): The photography was different. Though it is made in latest times, it looks as if its a period movie. Some of the dialogues are interesting as in all Tarantino's movies. The camera work for the accident was excellent. Its a kinda simple movie about a psycho killer. Its a time pass movie for me.
Chirutha (Telugu/Indian): Routine, cliche movie. The director's(Puri) affect is seen only in later half that too in some scenes. It lacks a story. Couldnt bear the action of the heroine. She overacted almost all scenes. Not recommended.
From dusk till dawn (English): The first half was ok. I didnt like the later part where its all about vampires. Except a couple of scenes, the movie was not good.
Sliver (English): It was ok. Not a good story. I felt the ending was incomplete. The movie has nothing except the romantic scenes.
Happy Days (Telugu/Indian): A good one. The movie is not an idealistic/realistic one but its purely entertaining. All the minute elements were arranged in such a way that overall the movie flows of like a cool breeze. The songs were an asset. I liked the "Rajesh" character so much. I burst out laughing at every dialogue of his. I kinda associated to people in real world. Other characters were too etched nicely. As the movie had 4 pairs, the screen space was arranged nicely and aptly. One pair is general youthful affair. The tyson's one was innocent and pure. Rajesh's was comic and Shankar's had very les space but selfish type. The elements which made me think its not an idealistic movie are the magics done by Tyson, principal being good, friendly and wise (I havent seen one in India like that so far, whereever I studied) and some minor things here and there. Other than that the movie entertains you to the fullest if you are from one of the similar colleges.
Memento(English): Watching it for 2nd time. A good movie. Brilliant screenplay. Nice sub-plot. It depicts a novel way of capturing an ordinary story.
3:10 to Yuma (English): OK. The climax scene was moving. Other than that the remaining part was ok. I felt it was not a great movie because the weakness in story. The story is all about moving a thief from one village to the nearby train station. The protagonist agrees to do it for some amount.
Death Proof (English): The photography was different. Though it is made in latest times, it looks as if its a period movie. Some of the dialogues are interesting as in all Tarantino's movies. The camera work for the accident was excellent. Its a kinda simple movie about a psycho killer. Its a time pass movie for me.
Chirutha (Telugu/Indian): Routine, cliche movie. The director's(Puri) affect is seen only in later half that too in some scenes. It lacks a story. Couldnt bear the action of the heroine. She overacted almost all scenes. Not recommended.
From dusk till dawn (English): The first half was ok. I didnt like the later part where its all about vampires. Except a couple of scenes, the movie was not good.
Sliver (English): It was ok. Not a good story. I felt the ending was incomplete. The movie has nothing except the romantic scenes.
Happy Days (Telugu/Indian): A good one. The movie is not an idealistic/realistic one but its purely entertaining. All the minute elements were arranged in such a way that overall the movie flows of like a cool breeze. The songs were an asset. I liked the "Rajesh" character so much. I burst out laughing at every dialogue of his. I kinda associated to people in real world. Other characters were too etched nicely. As the movie had 4 pairs, the screen space was arranged nicely and aptly. One pair is general youthful affair. The tyson's one was innocent and pure. Rajesh's was comic and Shankar's had very les space but selfish type. The elements which made me think its not an idealistic movie are the magics done by Tyson, principal being good, friendly and wise (I havent seen one in India like that so far, whereever I studied) and some minor things here and there. Other than that the movie entertains you to the fullest if you are from one of the similar colleges.
Monday, September 24, 2007
Sept 24, 2007
Unforgiven (English): The scenes were composed so splendidly that though they look simple they have lot of action and suspense. Clint Eastwood was at his best. It did not have some fast/loud background music but it was still interesting. Every scene makes us expect something to happen and a different thing happens. The action scenes were awesome. They are violent and also make a huge impact on the audience. I liked it very much.
Jaws (English): Its an old movie (1975). So, the initial part where most of the talking between the people goes was not much interesting to me. but as soon as the 3 actors go out on the boat to kill the shark, the story turns out interesting. This also had all the scenes filled with suspense, action and thrill. The camera work and screenplay was very good.
Syriana (English): The movie was slow paced. Some of the violence scenes were done good. The camera work was neat. I had no interest in the story so I did not like it.
American Beauty (English): I watched it for second time and it was more interesting. It had a very good script. Kevin spacey was awesome. The character etching for all the characters was done superbly. The conflict was plenty. Its a character driven movie. The narrator is Lester (Kevin Spacey). The opens with the actor saying "Today is my last day". The character transforms to a more optimistic state by the end of the movie and dies but the contradictory thing is now he feels life is all those moments which he enjoyed. He is no more afraid of losing anything. He even quotes to his boss "I am an ordinary man who has nothing to lose". Every character undergoes transformation in the movie but the major change is of Lest. The inciting incident happens when Lest meets his daughter's friend. The dramatic question is will Lest be able to achieve that girl by changing himself. So, the goal is to attract that girl, need is to change himself. He achieves the need by the end. He leaves the girl. The mid-point of the movie is when he starts working out and says the dialogue: "Everydays is the first day or your life except the day you die". Crisis is when he realizes that his daughter hates him, his wife is hooked up to someone else. He doesnt feel bad for any of those things. He is a changed man now. In the climax, he doesnt seduce the girl. This is a MUST watch movie.
Disturbia (English): Pretty good movie. Its a fairly simple story presented in a new way. The best thing of the movie is the camera. The first accident in which the father of the hero dies is awesome. I felt as if it happened to me. I dont know how the cinematographer was able to capture it but its breath-taking. The same kinda work is done in the last part where the hero fights the killer. The remaining part of the movie is good and entertaining. I felt the movie ended very easily. The kid kills the killer so easily. The tension and other things were excellent but a different ending would have made it a very good one.
Mr. Brooks (English): An OK killer movie. Kevin Costner did a wonderful action. The movie revolves around a killer who kills because he is addicted to it. He does the job without leaving any clue for the police. Overall you can watch it once.
thats it for now.
--Shiva
Jaws (English): Its an old movie (1975). So, the initial part where most of the talking between the people goes was not much interesting to me. but as soon as the 3 actors go out on the boat to kill the shark, the story turns out interesting. This also had all the scenes filled with suspense, action and thrill. The camera work and screenplay was very good.
Syriana (English): The movie was slow paced. Some of the violence scenes were done good. The camera work was neat. I had no interest in the story so I did not like it.
American Beauty (English): I watched it for second time and it was more interesting. It had a very good script. Kevin spacey was awesome. The character etching for all the characters was done superbly. The conflict was plenty. Its a character driven movie. The narrator is Lester (Kevin Spacey). The opens with the actor saying "Today is my last day". The character transforms to a more optimistic state by the end of the movie and dies but the contradictory thing is now he feels life is all those moments which he enjoyed. He is no more afraid of losing anything. He even quotes to his boss "I am an ordinary man who has nothing to lose". Every character undergoes transformation in the movie but the major change is of Lest. The inciting incident happens when Lest meets his daughter's friend. The dramatic question is will Lest be able to achieve that girl by changing himself. So, the goal is to attract that girl, need is to change himself. He achieves the need by the end. He leaves the girl. The mid-point of the movie is when he starts working out and says the dialogue: "Everydays is the first day or your life except the day you die". Crisis is when he realizes that his daughter hates him, his wife is hooked up to someone else. He doesnt feel bad for any of those things. He is a changed man now. In the climax, he doesnt seduce the girl. This is a MUST watch movie.
Disturbia (English): Pretty good movie. Its a fairly simple story presented in a new way. The best thing of the movie is the camera. The first accident in which the father of the hero dies is awesome. I felt as if it happened to me. I dont know how the cinematographer was able to capture it but its breath-taking. The same kinda work is done in the last part where the hero fights the killer. The remaining part of the movie is good and entertaining. I felt the movie ended very easily. The kid kills the killer so easily. The tension and other things were excellent but a different ending would have made it a very good one.
Mr. Brooks (English): An OK killer movie. Kevin Costner did a wonderful action. The movie revolves around a killer who kills because he is addicted to it. He does the job without leaving any clue for the police. Overall you can watch it once.
thats it for now.
--Shiva
Monday, September 17, 2007
Sept 17, 2007
movies I watched over the weekend are:
Life as a house (English): Good story, cinematography. The movie is kinda simple story revolving around a family. The emotions are picturized very nicely. The goal of the central character is to build the house and the need is to connect with his son. He dies without finishing the house but succeeds in connecting with his son and making him a good human-being. Finally the son donating the house to the girl who lost her legs in the accident made by his father is moving. The guy in the son's role did wonderful acting. His arc moves perfectly and he did fit the role aptly.
The lives of others (German): I felt the movie was slow. It revolves around the lives of people in East Germany in 60s. One thing I like in this movie is the characterization of the professor. The opening of the film is good. Overall the movie is OK.
Tootsie (English): It was hillarious. The movie was fast paced, interesting and funny. The characterization of the main actors is good. Dustin Hoffman gave an excellent performance for his role. The movie keeps you stay glued to the screen. The highlight of the movie is its climax. I have expected all different other endings but to my utter surprise the climax was completely different. The dialogue delivered by Hoffman in the climax is so lengthy, so funny and so surprising. The dialogue writer and Hoffman for delivering that lengthy dialogue should be given the praise. Its a must watch. It had a tight screenplay and plot.
Dhamaal (Hindi/Indian): The first act was slow and kinda expected but the movie picks up pace as it moves. The later acts are well packed and have lots of comedy. Some of them are already known but still make you laugh. The climax is good. The characterization is OK but not excellent which makes the first act not interesting. Overall the movie is good. Can watch it for the comedy.
Heyy Baby (Hindi/Indian): I did not like this one. The screenplay was not good. The events were very weak. The plot is not interesting. The plot-points are the routine expected cliche ones. Managed to get some comedy in 1 or 2 scenes but other than that, its not worth it. I wouldnt recommend this one. The camera work and direction were sufficient enough but as there was no good script it was bound to fail.
Broke back mountain (English): Its a slow paced movie but it makes you feel. Its a story about two guys who are in love with each other. I couldnt connect with it so might not have felt the depth of emotions but at the end it really creates the impact. The camera, script are all fine.
that was it for the weekend.
-Shiva
Life as a house (English): Good story, cinematography. The movie is kinda simple story revolving around a family. The emotions are picturized very nicely. The goal of the central character is to build the house and the need is to connect with his son. He dies without finishing the house but succeeds in connecting with his son and making him a good human-being. Finally the son donating the house to the girl who lost her legs in the accident made by his father is moving. The guy in the son's role did wonderful acting. His arc moves perfectly and he did fit the role aptly.
The lives of others (German): I felt the movie was slow. It revolves around the lives of people in East Germany in 60s. One thing I like in this movie is the characterization of the professor. The opening of the film is good. Overall the movie is OK.
Tootsie (English): It was hillarious. The movie was fast paced, interesting and funny. The characterization of the main actors is good. Dustin Hoffman gave an excellent performance for his role. The movie keeps you stay glued to the screen. The highlight of the movie is its climax. I have expected all different other endings but to my utter surprise the climax was completely different. The dialogue delivered by Hoffman in the climax is so lengthy, so funny and so surprising. The dialogue writer and Hoffman for delivering that lengthy dialogue should be given the praise. Its a must watch. It had a tight screenplay and plot.
Dhamaal (Hindi/Indian): The first act was slow and kinda expected but the movie picks up pace as it moves. The later acts are well packed and have lots of comedy. Some of them are already known but still make you laugh. The climax is good. The characterization is OK but not excellent which makes the first act not interesting. Overall the movie is good. Can watch it for the comedy.
Heyy Baby (Hindi/Indian): I did not like this one. The screenplay was not good. The events were very weak. The plot is not interesting. The plot-points are the routine expected cliche ones. Managed to get some comedy in 1 or 2 scenes but other than that, its not worth it. I wouldnt recommend this one. The camera work and direction were sufficient enough but as there was no good script it was bound to fail.
Broke back mountain (English): Its a slow paced movie but it makes you feel. Its a story about two guys who are in love with each other. I couldnt connect with it so might not have felt the depth of emotions but at the end it really creates the impact. The camera, script are all fine.
that was it for the weekend.
-Shiva
Monday, September 10, 2007
10 September 2007
back in form after a long time. watched 5 movies over the weekend.
RGV ki Aag (Hindi/Indian): Its a remake of the old movie "Sholay" released in 70s. The story is almost the same except a few scenes where the events are different. The director chose different camera angles. He wanted to try something different for his much awaited movie. I personally feel that whatever the technical stuff you use should to maximum level improve the way the story is told but not make the stuff complex and difficult for the audience to understand. I guess the second thing has happened in the case of Aag. I was watching the movie and the camera moved so fast (or scenes edited so fast) that at some point I got headache and my eyes couldnt stay on the screen. The other most important reason behind failure of the film is the actress in the role of "ghungroo". She didnt have the correct expressions. She did overact all scenes. The way she says the dialogue "Too much hain" was aweful. The complete characterization was worst. May be the director should have chosen a good one for that role. I assume the director was under pressure to make the movie differently and so he tried ways to do the same stuff differently and I feel there was less creativity in it. The villain "Babban" imitated Marlon Brando in Godfather for some of the scenes and some of the scenes were kinda comic. The positive things were the role of "Rambha bhai", few changes to the old story. Overall the movie is a below average movie. I think the selection of the actress and ordinary camera angles would have made it an average movie atleast.
Requiem for a dream (English):This movie is a good example for presenting stuff differently, novel, effectively,...etc of an old concept. The movie is about "the plight of drug addicts". An ordinary person can make a documentary with this kind of subject but the movie is not a documentary. By the end of the movie I can feel the pain, agony experienced by those people and I never want to get into that stuff. I mean I can literally feel its happening in front of my eyes. Simple narration, absolutely fabulous camera work, good background sound, fine editing and justified ending made the movie a good one. The best camera work was the way the maker portrayed the drug injection done by the guys. The pressing of needle, the adrenaline rush, the enlarging of the eye-ball,..etc. I dont know if this is all true or false but they definitely made an impact on me. As a sub-plot the director also showed that addiction to TV is also not less than consuming drugs. It makes you go to that farthest extent possible. At the end, everyone (all characters) is a loser. This is also an example to show the larger affect images have on human mind than lengthy/boring dialogues. Nothing is said in the climax. All the images are shown with a good back ground music which rises the tension in its audience. It made an impact on me. This movie is an example where the "Goal" and "Need" both are not achieved by the characters. The Goal of these guys was to become big, earn money, live rich life but their need was to earn this movie through selling drugs, consuming drugs, ...etc. This has a moral too, just as a documentary but just not pushed onto us. If your path is drugs,..etc you cant achieve your goal. Nice work by the cast and crew.
Sideways (English): This portrays the life of a loser. I analyze it to be a character-driven movie and not a plot-driven movie. The character doesnt have distinct goal and need. The publishing of book, his reunion with his divorced wife or new life with Maya could have made him happy. His life is just like any normal man's life. The presentation is pretty simple and neat. Miles saves the chevy blanc '61 for a great occassion but at the end when everything goes against him, he drinks that in a burger store, hiding it from people. He decides to let loose everything and live life as it comes. The next thing is he hears back from Maya. So, we assume that he gets Maya and then he might achieve other stuff too. Not a hi-fi flick but a pretty decent one to watch and connect with if you think life is going against you.
Good Will Hunting (English): I liked this a lot. It had so many intense moments and so much of emotions filled scenes. The dramatic question of the movie is: "Does Will Hunting take up the job or act as imagined by the Math professor?". The goal of the movie is that Will take up the NSA job. The need of the character is to solve his personal problem. We come to know by the end that the problem of Will is that he fears losing the people he want. So he acts defensively and loses them before they leave him. But after the counselling by Robin Williams, he gets cured and finally goes back to his girl friend. He doesnt take up the job. So, the need of the movie is fulfilled but not the goal. The inciting incident/catalyst is when Will solves the difficult Math problem, the way he answers the kid in the bar. The mid-point is when he starts talking with Robin Williams. The crisis is when his girl friend leaves him, his friend (Ben Affleck) tells him that he should get into a good job rather than working at the construction site. The climax is the point where Robin Williams tells Well "thats not your fault". Will breaks at this moment and his inner fear comes out. Resolution is that Will starts toward his girl friend, leaves a note for Robin, leaves his home as said by his friend. The last scene when Ben Affleck finds that the guy left made me feel very emotional. The director picturized the scenes awesome. A must watch movie.
The Prestige (English): A different/creative screenplay. The core concept of the movie is about jealousy, hatred-competition. The two guys in the same profession feel jealous and does things to make themselves great to such an extent that they can kill each other for it. The thing that makes this a different movie is its screenplay. The movie is presented as a flash-back revealing incidents from one guy's diary in which that guy reads this guy's diary. So its like seeing a mirror through another mirror. The inciting incident is when ideas of both the guys clash. The big event happens when one person's wife dies. The dramatic question is "who wins the competition and how?" Actually I feel there is no protagonist here. Both have done evil deeds. So, both should be punished. Hence two guys die at end. The only thing is that the identical brother of one of the guys' is alive. The moral is that if you are obsessed with something and do evil acts to gain success, you fail. Though the person loses his wife, he doesnt care. The only thing he always thinks is about is to become famous than the other guy. The other guy is married but keeps secret of his identical brother from her, giving his jealous-filled competition more importance than his wife. So, both of them die at the end. The mid-point is when one of the guys does the "Transported man" magic. Crisis is when the opposite guy tries to achieve the same magic through Tesla. The climax is when the other guy succeeds in performing the trick. Resolution is both of them die, the identical brother is revealed and also how did the Tesla's incomplete experiment work for the guy. A good screenplay.
thats it..
-Shiva
RGV ki Aag (Hindi/Indian): Its a remake of the old movie "Sholay" released in 70s. The story is almost the same except a few scenes where the events are different. The director chose different camera angles. He wanted to try something different for his much awaited movie. I personally feel that whatever the technical stuff you use should to maximum level improve the way the story is told but not make the stuff complex and difficult for the audience to understand. I guess the second thing has happened in the case of Aag. I was watching the movie and the camera moved so fast (or scenes edited so fast) that at some point I got headache and my eyes couldnt stay on the screen. The other most important reason behind failure of the film is the actress in the role of "ghungroo". She didnt have the correct expressions. She did overact all scenes. The way she says the dialogue "Too much hain" was aweful. The complete characterization was worst. May be the director should have chosen a good one for that role. I assume the director was under pressure to make the movie differently and so he tried ways to do the same stuff differently and I feel there was less creativity in it. The villain "Babban" imitated Marlon Brando in Godfather for some of the scenes and some of the scenes were kinda comic. The positive things were the role of "Rambha bhai", few changes to the old story. Overall the movie is a below average movie. I think the selection of the actress and ordinary camera angles would have made it an average movie atleast.
Requiem for a dream (English):This movie is a good example for presenting stuff differently, novel, effectively,...etc of an old concept. The movie is about "the plight of drug addicts". An ordinary person can make a documentary with this kind of subject but the movie is not a documentary. By the end of the movie I can feel the pain, agony experienced by those people and I never want to get into that stuff. I mean I can literally feel its happening in front of my eyes. Simple narration, absolutely fabulous camera work, good background sound, fine editing and justified ending made the movie a good one. The best camera work was the way the maker portrayed the drug injection done by the guys. The pressing of needle, the adrenaline rush, the enlarging of the eye-ball,..etc. I dont know if this is all true or false but they definitely made an impact on me. As a sub-plot the director also showed that addiction to TV is also not less than consuming drugs. It makes you go to that farthest extent possible. At the end, everyone (all characters) is a loser. This is also an example to show the larger affect images have on human mind than lengthy/boring dialogues. Nothing is said in the climax. All the images are shown with a good back ground music which rises the tension in its audience. It made an impact on me. This movie is an example where the "Goal" and "Need" both are not achieved by the characters. The Goal of these guys was to become big, earn money, live rich life but their need was to earn this movie through selling drugs, consuming drugs, ...etc. This has a moral too, just as a documentary but just not pushed onto us. If your path is drugs,..etc you cant achieve your goal. Nice work by the cast and crew.
Sideways (English): This portrays the life of a loser. I analyze it to be a character-driven movie and not a plot-driven movie. The character doesnt have distinct goal and need. The publishing of book, his reunion with his divorced wife or new life with Maya could have made him happy. His life is just like any normal man's life. The presentation is pretty simple and neat. Miles saves the chevy blanc '61 for a great occassion but at the end when everything goes against him, he drinks that in a burger store, hiding it from people. He decides to let loose everything and live life as it comes. The next thing is he hears back from Maya. So, we assume that he gets Maya and then he might achieve other stuff too. Not a hi-fi flick but a pretty decent one to watch and connect with if you think life is going against you.
Good Will Hunting (English): I liked this a lot. It had so many intense moments and so much of emotions filled scenes. The dramatic question of the movie is: "Does Will Hunting take up the job or act as imagined by the Math professor?". The goal of the movie is that Will take up the NSA job. The need of the character is to solve his personal problem. We come to know by the end that the problem of Will is that he fears losing the people he want. So he acts defensively and loses them before they leave him. But after the counselling by Robin Williams, he gets cured and finally goes back to his girl friend. He doesnt take up the job. So, the need of the movie is fulfilled but not the goal. The inciting incident/catalyst is when Will solves the difficult Math problem, the way he answers the kid in the bar. The mid-point is when he starts talking with Robin Williams. The crisis is when his girl friend leaves him, his friend (Ben Affleck) tells him that he should get into a good job rather than working at the construction site. The climax is the point where Robin Williams tells Well "thats not your fault". Will breaks at this moment and his inner fear comes out. Resolution is that Will starts toward his girl friend, leaves a note for Robin, leaves his home as said by his friend. The last scene when Ben Affleck finds that the guy left made me feel very emotional. The director picturized the scenes awesome. A must watch movie.
The Prestige (English): A different/creative screenplay. The core concept of the movie is about jealousy, hatred-competition. The two guys in the same profession feel jealous and does things to make themselves great to such an extent that they can kill each other for it. The thing that makes this a different movie is its screenplay. The movie is presented as a flash-back revealing incidents from one guy's diary in which that guy reads this guy's diary. So its like seeing a mirror through another mirror. The inciting incident is when ideas of both the guys clash. The big event happens when one person's wife dies. The dramatic question is "who wins the competition and how?" Actually I feel there is no protagonist here. Both have done evil deeds. So, both should be punished. Hence two guys die at end. The only thing is that the identical brother of one of the guys' is alive. The moral is that if you are obsessed with something and do evil acts to gain success, you fail. Though the person loses his wife, he doesnt care. The only thing he always thinks is about is to become famous than the other guy. The other guy is married but keeps secret of his identical brother from her, giving his jealous-filled competition more importance than his wife. So, both of them die at the end. The mid-point is when one of the guys does the "Transported man" magic. Crisis is when the opposite guy tries to achieve the same magic through Tesla. The climax is when the other guy succeeds in performing the trick. Resolution is both of them die, the identical brother is revealed and also how did the Tesla's incomplete experiment work for the guy. A good screenplay.
thats it..
-Shiva
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)